Twenty six year old non smoker male, resident of
Haryana (India), was admitted for elective surgery.
Medical consultation for pre-anaesthetic clearance
before surgery was sought for respiratory symptoms.
Patient complained of dry cough, breathlessness on
exertion and wheezing for the past two weeks. It
was not associated with any fever, nasal discharge,
sore throat. There was no previous history of similar
episode of wheezing chronic cough or dyspnoea. On
examination his vitals were stable and systemic
examination was remarkable for the presence of
bilateral extensive inpiratory and expiratory
wheeze with prolonged expiration.
Preoperative investigations revealed hemoglobin of
3 14 gm/dL; leukocyte count 47,800/ mm
3 with 75%
eosinophils, 15% polymorphs, 10% lymphocytes. His
erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 40 mm at the
end of first hour. Liver as well as kidney function
tests were in normal range.
Patient was further investigated for eosinophilia
and chest findings. Stool examination for ova and
cyst was negative and peripheral smear for
Microfilaria was unrevealing; there was no evidence
of immature or abnormal cells on peripheral blood
smear. His serum Angiotension Converting Enzyme
(ACE) levels and urinary calcium were normal.
High resolution CT (HRCT) and CECT chest was
done (Figure 2).
What are the chest X ray and HRCT findings?
Chest X ray PA view reveals bilateral lower zone
haziness with small reticulonodular opacities. HRCT
confirms the finding of reticulonodular shadow and
ground glass haziness in bilateral lung fields.
What is the differential diagnosis for this case?
The differential diagnosis of the case with
pulmonary eosinophilia is very wide and ranges from
intestinal infestation with parasites (Ascaris,
Toxocara, Capillaria, Schistosoma, Strongyloides,
Echinococci and non-parasitic causes such as
allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA),
extrinsic bronchial asthma, hypereosinophilic
syndrome, acute eosinophilic pneumonia,
sarcoidosis and tropical pulmonary eosinophilia [
1].
What is the diagnosis?
Tropical pulmonary eosinophilia (TPE). It is an
endemic disease of tropics and is believed to be due
to abnormal hypersensitivity response to filarial
parasite (Wuchereria bancrofti and Brugia malayi)
[
2]. In persons susceptible to the development of
TPE, the microfilariae released into the circulation
from adult worms in the lymphatics are rapidly
opsonized with antifilarial antibodies and these are
then cleared in the pulmonary vasculature [
3].
What are the clinical features of TPE? How can
one diagnose a case of TPE?
TPE occurs in <1% of patients suffering from
Lymphatic filariasis. The main features include
residence or travel to filarial-endemic region and
symptoms of paroxysmal cough with scanty sputum,
night time symptoms of wheeze, low grade fever
and reticulonodular infiltrates on chest x ray. The
four important criteria routinely used for diagnosis
include extreme peripheral blood eosinophilia
3 (>3000/mm ), antibodies (IgG/IgE) against filarial
antigen, raised IgE levels and absence of
microfilariae in both day and night blood samples
using concentration techniques [
4].
The final criteria commonly used for the diagnosis is
the dramatic response to Diethylcarbamazine
(DEC), although there are a proportion of patients
who do not respond to this, therefore it is not
considered to be an essential criteria [
5].
Clinical course and discussion
The diagnosis of TPE was made after Filarial
Antibody Test (FAT) was found to be positive and
patient fulfilled most of the proposed criteria. He
was treated with Diethylcarbamazine (DEC) 300mg/day in three divided doses for three weeks.
Post-treatment he showed complete recovery with
symptomatic relief in cough, dyspnoea and
complete radiological resolution of mottling and
reticular-nodules as well as disappearance of
eosinophilia from blood. Delayed diagnosis or
untreated cases of TPE can have persistent
symptoms for years and may develop pulmonary
interstitial fibrosis and permanent pulmonary
insufficiency and damage.
Computed Tomography especially HRCT has been
found to be better than plain radiography in
detecting nodularity, fibrosis, bronchiectasis, air
trapping, mediastinal adenopathy and calcification
[
6].
References
- Spry C J F, Kuma r a s w ami V. Tro p i c a l eosinophilia. Semin Hematol 1982;19:107-15.
- Otteson EA, Neva FA, Paranjape RS, Tripathy SP, Thiruvengadam KV, Beaven MA. Specific allergic sensitisation to filarial antigens in tropical eosinophilia syndrome. Lancet 1979;1:1158-61.
- Udwadia FE. Tropical eosinophilia. In: Herzog H, ed. Pulmonary eosinophilia: progress in respiration research (vol 7).Rasel: S Karger, 1975; 35-155
- Neva FA, Ottesan EA. Tropical filarial eosinophilia. N Engl J Med 1978;298:1129-31.
- Ong RK, Doyle RL.Tropical pulmonary eosinophilia. Chest 1998;113:1673-9.
- Sandhu M, Mukhopadhyay S, Sharma SK. Tropical pulmonary eosinophilia: a comparative evaluation of plain chest radiography and computed tomography. Australas Radiol 1996;40:32-7